Bill of Rights 1689.html

 
ca de en es fr it nl no pl pt ru ro fi sv tr vo


 

English Bill of Rights (1689).
English Bill of Rights (1689).

The Bill of Rights (or Declaration of Rights) is an act of the Parliament of England, with the long title An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown. It is largely a statement of certain rights that citizens and/or permanent residents of a constitutional monarchy were thought to be entitled to in the late 17th century, asserting subjects' right to petition the monarch, and to bear arms in defence. It also sets out – or, in the view of its drafters, restates – certain constitutional requirements of the Crown to seek the consent of the people, as represented in parliament. In this respect, the Bill of Rights differs from other bills of rights, including that of the United States of America, though many of the first eight amendments to the US constitution echo the contents of the 1689 Bill of Rights.

Along with the Act of Settlement, 1701, the Bill of Rights remains today one of the main constitutional laws governing the succession to not only the throne of the United Kingdom, but to those of the other Commonwealth realms as well, whether by willing deference to the act as a British statute (as is the case for Australia),[1] or as a patriated part of the particular realm's constitution (such as in Canada).[1] Since the implementation of the Statute of Westminster in each of the Commonwealth realms (on successive dates from 1931 onwards), the Bill of Rights cannot be altered in any realm except by that realm's own parliament, and then, by convention, and as it touches on the succession to the shared throne, only with the consent of all the other realms.[2] In the United Kingdom, the Bill of Rights is futher accompanied by the Magna Carta and Parliament Acts as some of the basic documents of the British constitution; a separate but similar document, the Claim of Right Act, applies in Scotland. Further, the bill is listed in the Republic of Ireland's Statute Law Revision (Pre-Union) Bill, 2006, as an English act of parliament to be retained as part of the country's law.[3]

Contents

Original context

In the Glorious Revolution, William of Orange landed with his army in England on November 5, 1688. James II, who had fled the country before William's arrival, attempted to resist this invasion, sending representatives as negotiators, but finally fled in defeat on December 23, 1688. Before William, and his wife Mary, were affirmed as co-rulers of England and Ireland, they accepted a Declaration of Right drawn up by the Convention Parliament, which was delivered to them at the Banqueting House, Whitehall, on February 13, 1689. Having accepted this declaration, William and Mary were offered the throne, and were crowned as joint monarchs in April of the same year. The Declaration of Right itself was later embodied in an act of parliament, now known as the Bill of Rights, on December 16, 1689.

In the then separate Kingdom of Scotland, the 1689 Claim of Right of the Scottish Estates was expressed in different terms, but to a largely similar effect, declaring William and Mary to be King and Queen of Scotland on April 11, 1689.

Provisions of the act

The Bill of Rights laid out certain basic tenets for, at the time, all Englishmen. These rights continue to apply today, not only in England, but in each of the jurisdictions of the Commonwealth realms as well. The people, embodied in parliament, are granted immutable civil and political rights through the act, including:

  • Freedom from royal interference with the law. Though the sovereign remains the fount of justice, he or she cannot unilaterally establish new courts or act as a judge.
  • Freedom from taxation by Royal Prerogative. The agreement of parliament became necessary for the implementation of any new taxes.
  • Freedom to petition the monarch.
  • Freedom from the standing army during a time of peace. The agreement of parliament became necessary before the army could be moved against the populace when not at war.
  • Freedom for Protestants to bear arms for their own defence, as suitable to their class and as allowed by law.
  • Freedom to elect members of parliament without interference from the sovereign.
  • Freedom of speech in parliament. This means that the proceedings of parliament can not be questioned in a court of law or any other body outside of parliament itself; this forms the basis of modern parliamentary privilege.
  • Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, as well as excessive bail.
  • Freedom from fine and forfeiture without a trial.

Certain acts of James VII and II were also specifically named and declared illegal by the Bill of Rights, while James' flight from England in the wake of the Glorious Revolution was also declared to be an abdication of the throne. Also, in a prelude to the Act of Settlement to come twelve years later, the Bill of Rights barred Roman Catholics from the throne of England, as "it hath been found by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom to be governed by a papist prince"; thus William III and Mary II were named as the successors of James VII and II, and that the throne would pass from them first to Mary's heirs, then to her sister, Princess Anne of Denmark and her heirs, and further to any heirs of William by a later marriage. The monarch was further required to swear a coronation oath to maintain the Protestant religion. The act also required the monarch to summon parliament frequently, a clause that was later reinforced by the Triennial Act, 1694.

Augmentation and effect

The Bill of Rights was later supplemented by the Act of Settlement in 1701 (while the Claim of Right Act in Scotland was supplemented by the Act of Union, 1707). Both the Bill of Rights and the Claim of Right contributed a great deal to the establishment of the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, and the curtailment of the powers of the monarch, leading ultimately to the establishment of constitutional monarchy, while also settling the political and religious turmoil that had convulsed Scotland, England, and Ireland in the 17th century. It also became a predecessor of the United States Constitution, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the European Convention on Human Rights. For example, as with the Bill of Rights, the US constitution requires jury trials and prohibits excessive bail and "cruel and unusual punishments." Similarly, "cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments" are banned under Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The bill continues to be cited in legal proceedings in the Commonwealth realms. For instance, on July 21, 1995, a libel case brought by Neil Hamilton (then a member of parliament) against The Guardian was stopped after Justice May ruled that the Bill of Rights' prohibition on the courts' ability to question parliamentary proceedings would prevent The Guardian from obtaining fair trial. Section 13 of the Defamation Act, 1996, was subsequently enacted to permit an MP to waive his parliamentary privilege. The Bill of Rights was also invoked in New Zealand, in the 1976 case of Fitzgerald v. Muldoon and Others, which centred on the pruporting of newly appointed Prime Minister Robert Muldoon that he would advise the Governor-General to abolish a superannuation scheme established by the New Zealand Superannuation Act, 1974, without new legislation; Muldoon felt that the dissolution would be immediate and he would later introduce a bill in parliament to retroactively make the abolition legal. This claim was challenged in court, and the Chief Justice declared that Muldoon's actions were illegal, as they had violated Article 1 of the Bill of Rights, which provides "that the pretended power of suspending laws of the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of parliament is illegal."

Two special designs of the British commemorative two pound coins were issued in the United Kingdom in 1989, to celebrate the tercentenary of the Glorious Revolution; one referred to the Bill of Rights and the other to the Claim of Right. Both depict the Royal Cypher of William and Mary and the mace of the House of Commons; one also shows a representation of the St. Edward's Crown, and another, the Crown of Scotland.

See also

References

External links

Wikisource has original text related to this article:


Constitution Act, 1867
Division of powers | Peace, order and good government | Criminal law power | Trade and Commerce clause | Works and Undertakings (Declaratory Power) | Property and civil rights | Disallowance and reservation

Canada Act 1982
Constitution Act, 1982
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms | Aboriginal Rights clause | Amending formula

List of Canadian constitutional documents

History of the Constitution
Royal Proclamation of 1763 | Quebec Act | Constitutional Act of 1791 | Act of Union 1840 | British North America Acts | Statute of Westminster 1931
Constitutional debate
Fulton-Favreau formula | Victoria Charter | Meech Lake Accord | Charlottetown Accord | Calgary Declaration | Other unsuccessful amendments
Interpretation of the Constitution
Pith and substance | Double aspect | Paramountcy | Living tree | Implied Bill of Rights | Dialogue principle | Interjurisdictional immunity
All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog.